Workplace

25% office occupancy improved all wellbeing and cognitive outcomes; full occupancy worsened all

Exact: 25% occupancy rate had positive effect on all responses; 100% had negative effect

A low occupancy rate (25%) improved all expected psychological and cognitive responses, while full occupancy (100%) had a negative effect on all

The MMNL model demonstrated that occupancy rate was the second most important attribute after plants. A 25% occupancy rate (relative to the 70% baseline) produced significant positive utilities for all five psychological and cognitive responses. Conversely, 100% occupancy yielded significant negative utilities for all responses, confirming that crowded open-plan offices are expected to harm both cognitive performance and psychological well-being.

Last, an occupancy rate of 25% rather than 70% (base) has a positive effect on the perception of all psychological and cognitive responses, while a rate of 100% has a negative effect.
Lisanne Bergefurt et al., 2023, Ergonomics

Machine-extracted, quote-verified. Report an error

Related findings

Read more in

Empty open-plan office with light-wood planted partitions and task chairs Workplace

What your office costs

Four design variables that move cognitive performance and who pays for them

22 May 2026 · 14 min · 25 sources
Empty classroom with wooden chair-desks and a full-height window onto trees Education

What school spaces do to children

Where the evidence on classroom air, acoustics, light and green is robust, where it is thin, and what to measure before the build.

12 May 2026 · 13 min · 18 sources

More from The Built Review

Silhouette of a person sitting at a floor-to-ceiling window with a view over Potsdamer Platz in Berlin Workplace

Germany's missing indoor-air bill

France, Britain and Australia have priced bad indoor air. Germany's missing number is a political choice, not a methodological limit.

10 Jun 2026 · 12 min · 14 sources
All reports

← All findings