Education

+16%

occupants in cleaner neighborhoods rated cleanliness satisfaction noticeably higher

Exact: Mean = 6.2 vs 5.33

Occupants in cleaner neighborhoods rated neighborhood cleanliness satisfaction 6.2 vs 5.33 for dirtier neighborhoods

A one-way ANOVA using survey data confirmed a statistically significant difference in perceived neighborhood cleanliness between the two building groups [F = 26.810, p < 0.01]. This validated the objective grouping of buildings by neighborhood quality and supported the subsequent comparative analyses of acoustic and visual indoor performance.

Respondents from Group 1 buildings (Mean = 6.2) are found to have significantly higher satisfaction towards neighborhood cleanliness when compared with that of the respondents from Group 2 (Mean = 5.33) buildings [F = 26.810, p < 0.01].
Isabelle Y.S. Chan et al., 2018, Building and Environment

Machine-extracted, quote-verified. Report an error

Related findings

Read more in

Empty classroom with wooden chair-desks and a full-height window onto trees Education

What school spaces do to children

Where the evidence on classroom air, acoustics, light and green is robust, where it is thin, and what to measure before the build.

12 May 2026 · 13 min · 18 sources
Residential apartment block with a stone facade, recessed balconies and lowered shutters Housing
09 Housing

What an insecure home does to people

Britain abolished no-fault eviction. The evidence reads it as a health intervention, and the market decides who it reaches.

31 May 2026 · 15 min · 24 sources

More from The Built Review

Silhouette of a person sitting at a floor-to-ceiling window with a view over Potsdamer Platz in Berlin Workplace

Germany's missing indoor-air bill

France, Britain and Australia have priced bad indoor air. Germany's missing number is a political choice, not a methodological limit.

10 Jun 2026 · 12 min · 14 sources
All reports

← All findings